https://www.counterview.net/2020/12/farm-bills-violate-federalism-would.html
Charu: PUCL
broader implications to constitutional freedoms...
link to usurping constitutional rights hasn't received adequate attention or become a part of the narrative of opposition to these laws. My point is about the clear framing of the lack of access to judicial remedies as violating fundamental rights and the Constitution. It is not as much about federalism and State and Center lists, which is a bit more abstract to internalise, though not less dangerous in outcome. Judicial remedies, I would argue, are also, not what many lay people would remember as fundamental rights, so there's an even greater need to emphasize them.
While searching articles in Bar and Bench Charu found: https://www.barandbench.com/columns/constitutionality-of-the-farm-acts-testing-the-soil-beneath
She says -The article for doesn't even mention judicial remedy.The article against stops short of linking the infringement of judicial remedy to constitutional rights.
While searching: farm laws constitutional rights she located:
https://thewire.in/rights/farm-laws-legal-rights-constitution & https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-acknowledges-farmers-right-to-non-violent-protest-says-would-set-up-panel-to-resolve-impasse/article33353958.ece
this is a gap in terms of the narrative of the laws’ implications for India and _all Indians_. The widespread emotional identification with farmers needs to be buttressed with the even more weighty threat to the Constitution. Highlighting this link and the clear opposite of “good intent” of the government in a live issue that has caught the nation’s heart and attention is urgent and essential.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3671930459566653