Social Dilemma

How Millions of Indians were BRAINWASHED? | The WhatsApp Mafia |https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Gmp2BAB3VA  Dhruv Rathee - I have stopped calling them Andh Bhakts.  They are our people, and we will have to take them along.

No ‘Likes’ for this: A US study is another deeply worrying pointer to the many negative effects of social media usage https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-editorials/no-likes-for-this-a-us-study-is-another-deeply-worrying-pointer-to-the-many-negative-effects-of-social-media-usage/ September 22, 2022

The forthcoming paper in the American Economic Review, based on biannual mental health surveys done across US campuses of 4.3 lakh respondents in that period, correlated to the introduction of Facebook in each campus. It found a 9% increase in depression and 12% increase in anxiety disorders over the pre-FB period mean, which researchers said was due to Facebook increasing the ability of students to do unfavourable social comparisons. More worryingly, it noted a 23% increase in students reporting academic impairment as a result of mental health decline...

India also tells a similar story. There were 43,000 victims of suicide in the sub-30 age group in 1991, which rose marginally to 45,000 in 2006, but then saw a near 50% rise to 67,000 in 2021. This is the time social media usage spread rapidly.

There’s much worse. Last year, a leak revealed Facebook had kept secret for two years internal research suggesting its Instagram app made body image issues worse for teenage girls. While Indian authorities take great pains to criminalise addictions of many kinds, social media in many ways is a worse menace. Facebook’s poor track record in filtering out hate content and fake news, Twitter’s seeming helplessness in face of fake content and fake accounts, all social media employing scandalously few content checkers

Google Is Not What It Seems by Julian Assange https://archive.ph/UDDBC#selection-693.93-693.365

Since at least the 1970s, authentic actors like unions and churches have folded under a sustained assault by free-market statism, transforming “civil society” into a buyer’s market for political factions and corporate interests looking to exert influence at arm’s length.

The civil society conference circuit—which flies developing-world activists across the globe hundreds of times a year to bless the unholy union between “government and private stakeholders” at geopoliticized events like the “Stockholm Internet Forum”—simply could not exist if it were not blasted with millions of dollars in political funding annually.

Nobody wants to acknowledge that Google has grown big and bad. But it has. Schmidt’s tenure as CEO saw Google integrate with the shadiest of US power structures as it expanded into a geographically invasive megacorporation. But Google has always been comfortable with this proximity. Long before company founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin hired Schmidt in 2001, their initial research upon which Google was based had been partly funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).48 And even as Schmidt’s Google developed an image as the overly friendly giant of global tech, it was building a close relationship with the intelligence community.

As the self-described “radical centrist”65 New York Times columnist Tom Friedman wrote in 1999, sometimes it is not enough to leave the global dominance of American tech corporations to something as mercurial as “the free market”:

The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist. McDonald’s cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the designer of the F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley’s technologies to flourish is called the US Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.66

If the future of the internet is to be Google, that should be of serious concern to people all over the world—in Latin America, East and Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa, the former Soviet Union, and even in Europe—for whom the internet embodies the promise of an alternative to US cultural, economic, and strategic hegemony.71

A “don’t be evil” empire is still an empire.

Is the Indian Republic vulnerable to Digital Colonization?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQX_QvxwoF4  12 mins. 27 Jan 2022 

This video starts with Republic day footage, and speaks about the changing pattern of viewership of the republic day parade and asks "How does the constitutional rights of citizens get lost in the new and ever evolving frontier of the internet, manipulative algorithms and ever watching AI?" calling it "Digital Colonisation" to speak about it understanding of the Digital media as colonisation. The film gives quotes from

Using quotes from Rajiv Malhotra's book, 'Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Power', https://www.aiandpower.com, the film intersperses sound bytes of Rajiv Malhotra while he is supposed to be interviewing somebody else.

Basically he used Leftist critique of Corporatisation as the new imperialism, to call it Digital Colonisation in order to sync which the general conspiracy theory of the "west" and its oppression of the "hindu" or the "eastern" calling Big Tech the New East India Company, and ending up justifying the Indian Governments move to imposing controls over Social Media.