Featured Articles

Reframing incentives for climate policy action

Reframing incentives for climate policy action | Nature Energy https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-021-00934-2 PDF: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-021-00934-2.pdf 

The costs of generating solar and wind energy, which depend on location, have already or will soon reach parity with the lowest-cost traditional fossil alternatives and investment in low-carbon technologies is generating substantial new employment. 

The notion that a country should benefit from free-riding on other countries’ climate policies can also be challenged. Incremental decarbonization, increasing energy efficiency and the economic impacts of COVID-19 have led oil and gas demand and prices to decline substantially.  Changes in oil and gas prices, combined with slumps in production, may therefore have disruptive structural effects on high-cost fossil fuel producers, such as the United States, Canada, Russia and South America. Meanwhile, shedding expensive imports benefits gross domestic product (GDP) and employment in large importer regions, such as the European Union, China and India, as money not spent on expensive energy imports is spent domestically, and output is boosted by major low-carbon investment programmes.

Half world’s fossil fuel assets could become worthless by 2036 in net zero transition Jonathan Watts, Ashley Kirk, Niamh McIntyre, Pablo Gutiérrez and Niko Kommenda https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2021/nov/04/fossil-fuel-assets-worthless-2036-net-zero-transition  Thu 4 Nov 2021

 

Countries that are slow to decarbonise will suffer but early movers will profit; the study finds that renewables and freed-up investment will more than make up for the losses to the global economy.

It highlights the risk of producing far more oil and gas than required for future demand, which is estimated to leave $11tn-$14tn (£8.1tn-£10.3tn) in so-called stranded assets – infrastructure, property and investments where the value has fallen so steeply they must be written off.

Shankar Sharma (by email)  comments:  In India's case more than half of coal power assets can be expected to face
the likelihood of becoming worthless for various reasons... Will it stir their leaders from blindly supporting fossil fule based economic paradigm? .. Our leaders continue to commit our limited resources into these ill-conceived projects.. 

IF we are serious of pursuing net-zero, why is our climate policy should straight away disincentivise coal for instance and not expand its mining, destroying forests, and forest dwelling communities. 

Further the progress on the incentivisatiion of decentralised renewable energy  like solar roof tops and net-metering is slow or tortuous , which again will incentivise hand over of large land and other resources to large centralised farms, and transmission systems  in order to fulfill our international committments. . 

NET-NET: More than making International committments, we need incentivise and empower poor people to move directly into a post carbon economy & energy development  which they are in control of. 

Why equity is key to stopping climate change

COP26 Glasgow: Why equity is key to stopping climate change. Indepth presentation by Sunita Narain https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol888qg-le8 Oct 31, 2021

Sunita Narain Director General, Centre for Science and Environment traces the inequities of emissions that has led to run away climate change. Issues such as cumulative historical emissions are slowly being phased out of the climate change discourse thereby removing the responsibility of a handful of countries like the US, the UK, the EU, Japan, Russia, Canada and Australia for creating the problem of global warming. Since 2001, China too has become part of the problem. Together the seven rich countries along with China will control over 70% of the carbon space left between 2020 and 2030.

Sunita Narain traces unjust share of carbon emissions that have helped a certain group of countries to develop while putting pressure on poor countries which are still developing to take unjust mitigation measures. Will net zero emissions targets by 2050 help the mitigate climate change? Sunita Narain says probably not, because that will mean emitting now and trying to offset it later.

 

The Facebook Crisis in India

The Facebook Crisis in India Might Be the Worst Facebook Crisis of All By Nitish Pahwa  https://slate.com/technology/2021/10/facebook-papers-india-modi-misinformation-rss-bjp.html 
Oct 26, 2021

Facebook ignored, downplayed, or failed to adequately address harassment, mis- and disinformation, and incitements to violence on its platform in several major countries. ..Yet the most shocking revelations concern the nation that serves as the app’s biggest user base: India, the world’s largest backsliding democracy. 

.. the Facebook Papers confirm is not just that the network failed to curb Hindu nationalist hate speech and inadequately directed resources to monitor a nation with 340 million users; it also actively granted impunity to the worst offenders. 

the company’s “misinformation classifiers”—automated systems trained on machine learning to detect and take down posts with harmful falsehoods—were not developed enough to recognize and take action on millions of multilanguage disinformation posts that proliferated across Indian feeds.

reports of BJP-linked cells using Facebook and WhatsApp to spread toxic rhetoric and lies surfaced as early as 2016; more such troll operations proliferated in the subsequent years, both within and without election contexts, and led directly to lynchings of religious minorities and riots stirred up by aggrieved Hindus...According to the Wall Street Journal, investigators zoned in on two BJP-linked Hindu nationalist organizations they pinpointed as key drivers of mass Islamophobia, the RSS and the Bajrang Dal, and recommended that the latter be banned. But it didn’t happen, as the company worried that removing the Bajrang Dal would anger Modi. The Journal revealed last year that the then-head of Facebook India, Ankhi Das, opposed applying hate speech rules to Hindu nationalists and BJP politicians..  (Das stepped down by October 2020.)

This year, Modi’s government has cracked down the hardest it ever has on Facebook and other social networks, forcing them to remove posts unfavorable to the BJP, condemning them for spreading content supposedly offensive to fundamentalist Hindus, and threatening to fully expel them if they don’t follow new, restrictive rules drawn up by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology meant to ensure compliance. The message is clear: If Facebook doesn’t follow the BJP’s Hindu nationalist dogma to a T, it can kiss its largest market goodbye.