Hindutva is Hindu modernity Abhinav Prakash Singh AUG 31, 2021 https://www.hindustantimes.com/opinion/hindutva-is-hindu-modernity-101630406266372.html | Hindutva is not Hindu modernity; it is populism Zia Haq SEP 04, 2021 https://www.hindustantimes.com/opinion/hindutva-is-not-hindu-modernity-it-is-populism-101630760964058.html |
Traumatic and terrifying experience of the non-western world in its encounter with western colonialism, which was backed by modern industry, a new economic structure of capitalism, and a new political structure of nations and nation-States. | The modern idea of a nation is territorial, but nationhood in Hindutva is race-centric, having been informed heavily by 20th-century European nationalism. |
Reformers were not only imagining the future but also re-imagining the past. They argued that modern values such as social equality, political democracy, liberty, the idea of the nation are all rooted in Hindu tradition and philosophy. | Voltaire’s idea of liberty.. John Stuart Mill’s democracy as a “government by discussion” and the Hobbesian world where the State has all monopoly over violence — these constitute the bedrock of modernity. |
Hence, Hindu society and polity are naturally at home in the modern era. All segments of the Hindu polity, from the Left to the Right, argued for a modern nation despite rooting their positions in the civilisational antiquity of India. |
Modernity, its “desacralising” impact, rejects anything sacred. Neither the clergy, nor the Church is sacred anymore; neither race nor the human body, making it possible to sell and buy human labour at a market price. The current non-liberal social order brought forth by Hindutva is, therefore, not a distortion of Hindutva, but its truest expression. Hindutva, whatever it was intended to be, has been reduced to Rightwing populism and a mode of politics. |
None of them wanted a return to the past, unlike their counterparts in the Muslim polity, but wanted to learn from the values of a past and reinterpret it in a modern image. | Hindutva prescribes limits to who a Hindu could be; modernity prescribes no specifications on who a member of modern society could be. A Hindu is one who inherits that “blood of the great race” |
The social contract within the ambit of modernity is mediated by citizenship, which is the highest legal status of an individual. | |
Hindutva always confined itself to the aim of a Hindu Rashtra (nation), and, at no point, did it argue for a Hindu Rajya (State). Even the Hindu Mahasabha proposed a secular State based on the principle of one-man, one-vote. | Hindutva as propounded by Savarkar and being practised today, is a non-liberal social order presaged on race, culture, and faith, arching high over secular citizenship, an integral aspect of modernity. |