CIVIL SOCIETY: ENEMY OF THE STATE? 28 November 2021 CCG OPEN LETTER TO CITIZENS OF INDIA 28 November 2021

Dear fellow citizens,
We are a group of former civil servants of the All India and Central Services who have worked with the Central and State Governments in the course of our careers. As a group, we have no affiliation with any political party but believe in impartiality, neutrality and commitment to the Constitution of India.
A disturbing trend in the direction of the country’s governance has become discernible over the past few years. The foundational values of our republic and the cherished norms of governance, which we had taken as immutable, have been under the relentless assault of an arrogant, majoritarian state. The sacrosanct principles of secularism and human rights have come to acquire a pejorative sense. Civil society activists striving to defend these principles are subjected to arrest and indefinite detention under draconian laws that blot our statute book. The establishment does its best to discredit them as anti-national and foreign agents.

Civil society, a diverse mass of formal and informal groups pursuing their own interests, occupies the vast democratic space outside of government and business. As the locus of critique, contestation and negotiation, it is an important stakeholder in governance, as well as
a force multiplier and partner in the project of meeting popular aspirations. But civil society is viewed through an adversarial prism today. Any entity, which dares to highlight deviations from the norms of Constitutional conduct, or question the arbitrary exercise of executive
authority, runs the risk of being projected as a foreign agent and enemy of the people. At a  systemic level, the financial viability of civil society organisations is being progressively undermined by tweaking the legal framework governing foreign contributions, deployment of
corporate social responsibility funds and income tax exemptions.

Our anxiety with regard to the articulation of the state-civil society interface has been heightened in recent weeks by statements emanating from high dignitaries of the state. On the occasion of the Foundation Day of the National Human Rights Commission, its Chair, Justice (retd.) Arun Mishra, asserted that India’s creditable record on human rights was being tarnished at the behest of international forces. The Prime Minister, on his part, discerned a political agenda in what he felt was selective perception of human rights violation in certain incidents, while overlooking certain others. And quite shockingly, General Bipin Rawat, Chief of Defence Staff, gave a fillip to the growing menace of vigilantism by endorsing the killing of persons believed to be terrorists by lynch mobs in Kashmir.

Taken together, these portents indicate a deliberate strategy to deny civil society the space and wherewithal for its operation. The contours of this strategy have now been revealed in the New Doval Doctrine propounded by the National Security Adviser (NSA). Reviewing the passing out parade of IPS probationers at the National Police Academy in Hyderabad, Shri Ajit Doval proclaimed:
“The new frontiers of war, what you call the fourth- generation warfare, is the civil society.  Wars have ceased to become an effective instrument for achieving political or military objectives. They are too expensive and unaffordable and, at the same time, there is uncertainty about their outcome. But it is the civil society that can be subverted, that can be suborned, that can be divided, that can be manipulated to hurt the interests of a nation. You are there to see that they stand fully protected.”

Instead of exhorting the IPS probationers to abide by the values enshrined in the Constitution to which they had sworn allegiance, the NSA stressed the primacy of the representatives of the people, and the laws framed by them. It would be pertinent to recall here that the term “fourth-generation warfare” is normally employed in relation to a conflict where the state is fighting non-state actors, such as terror groups and insurgents. Civil society now finds itself placed in this company. Earlier, the term “Urban Naxal” was being used to denigrate individual human rights activists. Clearly, under the New Doval Doctrine, people like Father Stan Swamy would become the arch enemy of the Indian state and the prime concern and target of its security forces.

The NSA’s clarion call for an onslaught on a demonised civil society is of a piece with the narrative of hate targeting defenders of Constitutional values and human rights that is regularly purveyed by the high and mighty in the establishment. The defining traits of the current dispensation are hubris and an utter disregard of democratic norms. These were manifest in the steamrolling of a discriminatory Citizenship(Amendment) Act through Parliament, its linkage with the National Register of Citizens, and the ruthless suppression of the spontaneous protests that erupted in various parts of the country.

The same traits were in evidence in the enactment of a set of three farm laws without public debate, stakeholder consultations or endorsement by alliance partners, and the highhanded treatment accorded to the agitated farmers encamped at the gates of Delhi. Their heroic resistance over fourteen months elicited the choicest of epithets from the establishment. Dubbed variously as “Andolanjeevis” (professional agitators), “Left-wing extremists” and “Khalistanis”, they were accused of working at the behest of “Foreign Destructive Ideology”, in a bizarre word-play with the acronym FDI referring to Foreign Direct Investment. Electoral compulsions might have led the Prime Minister to announce the decision to repeal the hated laws, but the damage done to the nation’s polity and social fabric will be hard to repair.

Let us hope that the government will realize the pitfalls of demonising dissent and trying to suppress civil resistance by brute force. It is also hoped that the alumni of the National Police Academy, or indeed our security forces in general, will not be swayed by the NSA’s
rhetoric and remember that their primary duty is to uphold Constitutional values, which override the will of the political executive. Even the laws framed by the legislatures have to be tested on the touchstone of constitutionality and accepted by the people. If this fundamental principle is not accepted, we may turn to the well-known satirical poem “The Solution”, written
in a different context by the famous German playwright Bertolt Brecht, which concludes with
the following words:

Would it not in that case be simpler for the government To dissolve the people
And elect another?
SATYAMEVA JAYATE

(102 signatories, at pages 4-8 below)

1. Anita Agnihotri IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Department of Social Justice Empowerment, GoI
2. Salahuddin Ahmad IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan
3. S.P. Ambrose IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Secretary, Ministry of Shipping & Transport, GoI
4. Anand Arni RAS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, GoI
5. Vappala Balachandran IPS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, GoI
6. Gopalan Balagopal IAS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
7. Chandrashekhar Balakrishnan IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Coal, GoI
8. T.K. Banerji IAS (Retd.) Former Member, Union Public Service Commission
9. Sharad Behar IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh
10. Aurobindo Behera IAS (Retd.) Former Member, Board of Revenue, Govt. of Odisha
11. Madhu Bhaduri IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Portugal
12. Meeran C Borwankar
IPS (Retd.) Former DGP, Bureau of Police Research and Development, GoI
13. Ravi Budhiraja IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, GoI
14. Sundar Burra IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra
15. R.
Chandramohan
IAS (Retd.) Former Principal Secretary, Transport and Urban
Development, Govt. of NCT of Delhi
16. Rachel
Chatterjee
IAS (Retd.) Former Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture, Govt. of
Andhra Pradesh
17. Kalyani
Chaudhuri
IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
18. Gurjit Singh
Cheema
IAS (Retd.) Former Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Govt. of
Punjab
19. F.T.R. Colaso IPS (Retd.) Former Director General of Police, Govt. of Karnataka &
former Director General of Police, Govt. of Jammu &
Kashmir
20. Anna Dani IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra
21. Surjit K. Das IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of Uttarakhand
22. Vibha Puri Das IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, GoI
5
23. P.R. Dasgupta IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Food Corporation of India, GoI
24. Pradeep K. Deb IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Deptt. Of Sports, GoI
25. Nitin Desai Former Chief Economic Adviser, Ministry of Finance,
GoI
26. M.G.
Devasahayam
IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Govt. of Haryana
27. Sushil Dubey IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Sweden
28. A.S. Dulat IPS (Retd.) Former OSD on Kashmir, Prime Minister’s Office, GoI
29. K.P. Fabian IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Italy
30. Prabhu Ghate IAS (Retd.) Former Addl. Director General, Department of Tourism,
GoI
31. Gourisankar
Ghosh
IAS (Retd.) Former Mission Director, National Drinking Water
Mission, GoI
32. Suresh K. Goel IFS (Retd.) Former Director General, Indian Council of Cultural
Relations, GoI
33. S. Gopal IPS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary, GoI
34. S.K. Guha IAS (Retd.) Former Joint Secretary, Department of Women & Child
Development, GoI
35. H.S. Gujral IFoS (Retd.) Former Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Govt. of
Punjab
36. Meena Gupta IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests,
GoI
37. Ravi Vira
Gupta
IAS (Retd.) Former Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India
38. Wajahat
Habibullah
IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, GoI and former Chief Information
Commissioner
39. Deepa Hari IRS
(Resigned)
40. Sajjad Hassan IAS (Retd.) Former Commissioner (Planning), Govt. of Manipur
41. Kamal Jaswal IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Department of Information
Technology, GoI
42. Brijesh Kumar IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Department of Information
Technology, GoI
43. Ish Kumar IPS (Retd.) Former DGP (Vigilance & Enforcement), Govt. of
Telangana and former Special Rapporteur, National
Human Rights Commission
6
44. Sudhir Kumar IAS (Retd.) Former Member, Central Administrative Tribunal
45. Subodh Lal IPoS
(Resigned)
Former Deputy Director General, Ministry of
Communications, GoI
46. Harsh Mander IAS (Retd.) Govt. of Madhya Pradesh
47. Amitabh
Mathur
IPS (Retd.) Former Special Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, GoI
48. L.L. Mehrotra IFS (Retd.) Former Special Envoy to the Prime Minister and former
Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, GoI
49. Aditi Mehta IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan
50. Shivshankar
Menon
IFS (Retd.) Former Foreign Secretary and Former National Security
Adviser
51. Sonalini
Mirchandani
IFS
(Resigned)
GoI
52. Malay Mishra IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Hungary
53. Sunil Mitra IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Finance, GoI
54. Noor
Mohammad
IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, National Disaster Management
Authority, GoI
55. Avinash
Mohananey
IPS (Retd.) Former Director General of Police, Govt. of Sikkim
56. Satya Narayan
Mohanty
IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary General, National Human Rights
Commission
57. Deb Mukharji IFS (Retd.) Former High Commissioner to Bangladesh and former
Ambassador to Nepal
58. Shiv Shankar
Mukherjee
IFS (Retd.) Former High Commissioner to the United Kingdom
59. Gautam
Mukhopadhaya
IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Myanmar
60. Pranab S.
Mukhopadhyay
IAS (Retd.) Former Director, Institute of Port Management, GoI
61. Nagalsamy IA&AS
(Retd.)
Former Principal Accountant General, Tamil Nadu &
Kerala
62. Sobha
Nambisan
IAS (Retd.) Former Principal Secretary (Planning), Govt. of
Karnataka
63. P.A. Nazareth IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Egypt and Mexico
64. P. Joy Oommen IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh
7
65. Amitabha
Pande
IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Inter-State Council, GoI
66. Mira Pande IAS (Retd.) Former State Election Commissioner, West Bengal
67. Maxwell
Pereira
IPS (Retd.) Former Joint Commissioner of Police, Delhi
68. Alok Perti IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Coal, GoI
69. R.
Poornalingam
IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Textiles, GoI
70. Rajesh Prasad IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to the Netherlands
71. R.M.
Premkumar
IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra
72. N.K.
Raghupathy
IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Staff Selection Commission, GoI
73. V.P. Raja IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory
Commission
74. K. Sujatha Rao IAS (Retd.) Former Health Secretary, GoI
75. M.Y. Rao IAS (Retd.)
76. Prasadranjan
Ray
IAS (Retd.) Former Chairperson, West Bengal Electricity Regulatory
Commission
77. Satwant Reddy IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Chemicals and Petrochemicals, GoI
78. Vijaya Latha
Reddy
IFS (Retd.) Former Deputy National Security Adviser, GoI
79. Julio Ribeiro IPS (Retd.) Former Adviser to Governor of Punjab & former
Ambassador to Romania
80. Aruna Roy IAS
(Resigned)
81. Manabendra N.
Roy
IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
82. A.K. Samanta IPS (Retd.) Former Director General of Police (Intelligence), Govt. of
West Bengal
83. Deepak Sanan IAS (Retd.) Former Principal Adviser (AR) to Chief Minister, Govt.
of Himachal Pradesh
84. G. Sankaran IC&CES
(Retd.)
Former President, Customs, Excise and Gold (Control)
Appellate Tribunal
85. S. Satyabhama IAS (Retd.) Former Chairperson, National Seeds Corporation, GoI
86. N.C. Saxena IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Planning Commission, GoI
8
87. A. Selvaraj IRS (Retd.) Former Chief Commissioner, Income Tax, Chennai, GoI
88. Ardhendu Sen IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
89. Abhijit
Sengupta
IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, Ministry of Culture, GoI
90. Aftab Seth IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Japan
91. Ashok Kumar
Sharma
IFoS (Retd.) Former MD, State Forest Development Corporation,
Govt. of Gujarat
92. Ashok Kumar
Sharma
IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Finland and Estonia
93. Navrekha
Sharma
IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Indonesia
94. Raju Sharma IAS (Retd.) Former Member, Board of Revenue, Govt. of Uttar
Pradesh
95. Tara Ajai Singh IAS (Retd.) Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Karnataka
96. Tirlochan Singh IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary, National Commission for Minorities,
GoI
97. Parveen Talha IRS (Retd.) Former Member, Union Public Service Commission
98. P.S.S. Thomas IAS (Retd.) Former Secretary General, National Human Rights
Commission
99. Hindal Tyabji IAS (Retd.) Former Chief Secretary rank, Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir
100. Ashok Vajpeyi IAS (Retd.) Former Chairman, Lalit Kala Akademi
101. Ramani
Venkatesan
IAS (Retd.) Former Director General, YASHADA, Govt. of
Maharashtra
102. Rudi Warjri IFS (Retd.) Former Ambassador to Colombia, Ecuador and Costa
Rica

Remember how the Constitution was brought into being   https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/how-constitution-was-brought-into-being-7653286/   3-12-2021 G. N. Devy writes: Tribal communities, workers, peasants, students and the common people braved imprisonment or bullets and fought for the dream of a freedom that would ensure justice and equality

One agrees with the CJI that the people have kept the Constitution alive, despite the “clean chits” to architects of riots and FIRs against victims of atrocities. One agrees with opposition parties that democratic institutions have crumbled; outside as well inside the political parties. Yes, the Prime Minister was right in pointing to “family-centric” action as a hindrance to development. Indeed, catering to only a few corporate families has caused a grave economic crisis for the rest of India.

One wonders if, like the mythical Prajapati, the praja could laugh, for it knows that “once the Constitution” is no guarantee of “always the Constitution”. Surely, it is watching through millions of eyes.

G20 ROME LEADERS’ DECLARATION  https://www.g20.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/G20-ROME-LEADERS-DECLARATION.pdf 

Top Takeaways from the UN World Leaders Summit at COP26 https://www.wri.org/insights/top-takeaways-un-world-leaders-summit-cop26 
November 4, 2021 By Helen Mountford, David Waskow, Jamal Srouji, Frances Seymour, Lorena Gonzalez and Chirag Gajjar

Over 140 countries submitted updated 2030 climate plans, or nationally determined contributions (NDCs), under the Paris Climate Agreement in advance of COP26.  https://www.climatewatchdata.org/2020-ndc-tracker 

 COP26: Unpacking India’s Major New Climate Targets 
by Apurba Mitra, Chirag Gajjar and Ulka Kelkar - November 02, 2021 https://wri-india.org/blog/cop26-unpacking-india%E2%80%99s-major-new-climate-targets 

The talks need to deliver three things:

First, COP26 negotiations must conclude with countries agreeing that major emitters come back within the next couple of years to step up their 2030 targets further to align with the 1.5 degrees C goal. The only way for this goal to remain in reach is if major emitters rapidly drive down emissions in the next decade — much more than they have committed to already.

Second, developing countries deserve much more confidence that finance pledges will be met. Developed countries must reassure developing countries that shortfalls in 2020 and beyond will be filled and that there will be a significant increase in finance for adaptation and loss and damage. Glasgow should also address matters of quality of climate finance, especially to ensure that the needs and priorities of developing countries are met without creating additional debt burden.

Finally, the outstanding rules of the Paris Agreement must put the right conditions in place to accelerate efforts to cut emissions and deliver finance to developing countries. It is more important to get the rules right than to adopt rules that are weak and would undermine the global accord.

'Capitalism is killing the planet': Protesters rally in Glasgow's COP26" https://www.deccanherald.com/international/world-news-politics/capitalism-is-killing-the-planet-protesters-rally-in-glasgows-cop26-1047887.html 

Reframing incentives for climate policy action | Nature Energy https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-021-00934-2 PDF: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-021-00934-2.pdf 

The costs of generating solar and wind energy, which depend on location, have already or will soon reach parity with the lowest-cost traditional fossil alternatives and investment in low-carbon technologies is generating substantial new employment. 

The notion that a country should benefit from free-riding on other countries’ climate policies can also be challenged. Incremental decarbonization, increasing energy efficiency and the economic impacts of COVID-19 have led oil and gas demand and prices to decline substantially.  Changes in oil and gas prices, combined with slumps in production, may therefore have disruptive structural effects on high-cost fossil fuel producers, such as the United States, Canada, Russia and South America. Meanwhile, shedding expensive imports benefits gross domestic product (GDP) and employment in large importer regions, such as the European Union, China and India, as money not spent on expensive energy imports is spent domestically, and output is boosted by major low-carbon investment programmes.

Half world’s fossil fuel assets could become worthless by 2036 in net zero transition Jonathan Watts, Ashley Kirk, Niamh McIntyre, Pablo Gutiérrez and Niko Kommenda https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2021/nov/04/fossil-fuel-assets-worthless-2036-net-zero-transition  Thu 4 Nov 2021

Countries that are slow to decarbonise will suffer but early movers will profit; the study finds that renewables and freed-up investment will more than make up for the losses to the global economy.

It highlights the risk of producing far more oil and gas than required for future demand, which is estimated to leave $11tn-$14tn (£8.1tn-£10.3tn) in so-called stranded assets – infrastructure, property and investments where the value has fallen so steeply they must be written off.

Shankar Sharma (by email)  comments:  In India's case more than half of coal power assets can be expected to face
the likelihood of becoming worthless for various reasons... Will it stir their leaders from blindly supporting fossil fule based economic paradigm? .. Our leaders continue to commit our limited resources into these ill-conceived projects.. 

IF we are serious of pursuing net-zero, why is our climate policy should straight away disincentivise coal for instance and not expand its mining, destroying forests, and forest dwelling communities. 

Further the progress on the incentivisatiion of decentralised renewable energy  like solar roof tops and net-metering is slow or tortuous , which again will incentivise hand over of large land and other resources to large centralised farms, and transmission systems  in order to fulfill our international committments. . 

NET-NET: More than making International committments, we need incentivise and empower poor people to move directly into a post carbon economy & energy development  which they are in control of. 

COP26 Glasgow: Why equity is key to stopping climate change. Indepth presentation by Sunita Narain https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol888qg-le8 Oct 31, 2021

Sunita Narain Director General, Centre for Science and Environment traces the inequities of emissions that has led to run away climate change. Issues such as cumulative historical emissions are slowly being phased out of the climate change discourse thereby removing the responsibility of a handful of countries like the US, the UK, the EU, Japan, Russia, Canada and Australia for creating the problem of global warming. Since 2001, China too has become part of the problem. Together the seven rich countries along with China will control over 70% of the carbon space left between 2020 and 2030.

Sunita Narain traces unjust share of carbon emissions that have helped a certain group of countries to develop while putting pressure on poor countries which are still developing to take unjust mitigation measures. Will net zero emissions targets by 2050 help the mitigate climate change? Sunita Narain says probably not, because that will mean emitting now and trying to offset it later.

The Facebook Crisis in India Might Be the Worst Facebook Crisis of All By Nitish Pahwa  https://slate.com/technology/2021/10/facebook-papers-india-modi-misinformation-rss-bjp.html 
Oct 26, 2021

Facebook ignored, downplayed, or failed to adequately address harassment, mis- and disinformation, and incitements to violence on its platform in several major countries. ..Yet the most shocking revelations concern the nation that serves as the app’s biggest user base: India, the world’s largest backsliding democracy. 

.. the Facebook Papers confirm is not just that the network failed to curb Hindu nationalist hate speech and inadequately directed resources to monitor a nation with 340 million users; it also actively granted impunity to the worst offenders. 

the company’s “misinformation classifiers”—automated systems trained on machine learning to detect and take down posts with harmful falsehoods—were not developed enough to recognize and take action on millions of multilanguage disinformation posts that proliferated across Indian feeds.

reports of BJP-linked cells using Facebook and WhatsApp to spread toxic rhetoric and lies surfaced as early as 2016; more such troll operations proliferated in the subsequent years, both within and without election contexts, and led directly to lynchings of religious minorities and riots stirred up by aggrieved Hindus...According to the Wall Street Journal, investigators zoned in on two BJP-linked Hindu nationalist organizations they pinpointed as key drivers of mass Islamophobia, the RSS and the Bajrang Dal, and recommended that the latter be banned. But it didn’t happen, as the company worried that removing the Bajrang Dal would anger Modi. The Journal revealed last year that the then-head of Facebook India, Ankhi Das, opposed applying hate speech rules to Hindu nationalists and BJP politicians..  (Das stepped down by October 2020.)

This year, Modi’s government has cracked down the hardest it ever has on Facebook and other social networks, forcing them to remove posts unfavorable to the BJP, condemning them for spreading content supposedly offensive to fundamentalist Hindus, and threatening to fully expel them if they don’t follow new, restrictive rules drawn up by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology meant to ensure compliance. The message is clear: If Facebook doesn’t follow the BJP’s Hindu nationalist dogma to a T, it can kiss its largest market goodbye.

SC Pegasus Ruling Historic; An Indictment of Modi Government: Dushyant Dave https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-Er8fzUM8g Oct 27, 2021

In a 18-minute interview to Karan Thapar for The Wire, Dushyant Dave, a former President of the Supreme Court Bar Association, said the judgement is based on the Supreme Court’s assumption that Pegasus was used and that the right to privacy of Indian citizens was breached. He says the language used by the Supreme Court about national security and privacy “clearly establishes the Court is worried about the infringement of citizen’s right”.

Dushyant Dave says: “The Supreme Court has clearly and categorically stood with the citizens of India”. He adds: “It has told the government enough is enough”. He says the Supreme Court has said: “We are here as watchdogs”.

Pegasus Project: जासूसी कांड पर Supreme Court का ऐतिहासिक आदेश, कटघरे में Modi सरकार | Arfa Kahnum https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YE9PfKVrkE 27 Oct 2012

The Supreme Court on Wednesday constituted a committee of experts to probe the case of alleged spying of Indian citizens through Israeli spyware 'Pegasus'. The court said that privacy cannot be violated under the guise of national security.
The Supreme Court said its endeavor is to uphold the constitutional aspirations and rule of law without indulging in "political rhetoric", but added that the petitions filed in the matter raise "Orwellian concerns".
Orwellian refers to that unjust and authoritarian position, idea or social condition, which is destructive to the welfare of a free and open society.
A bench of Chief Justice NV Ramana, Justice Surya Kant and Justice Hima Kohli quoted English novelist Orwell as saying, "If you want to keep something a secret, you must also hide it from yourself."

"Won't Be A Mere Spectator": SC's Earful For Modi Govt, Appoints Committee To Probe Pegasus Case https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnjDHtFBneA Oct 27, 2021

"More than a month after reserving its interim order in the Pegasus Snooping Case, the Supreme Court finally today announced its order in the case. The Supreme court appointed an independent committee comprising three technical experts who will be supervised by its retired judge Justice R V Raveendran. The committee has been tasked to conduct a “thorough inquiry” into allegations of use of Pegasus software for unauthorised surveillance by the govt. A bench headed by Chief Justice of India N V Ramana said the committee will “enquire, investigate and determine” whether Pegasus Spyware was used to snoop upon the Indian citizens? What steps did the GoI take? Were there any enquiries conducted post-2019 revelations regarding the Pegasus spyware? and whether it was the Government of India which bought the Pegasus spyware?
A very important order has been given by the Supreme Court today. The Pegasus snooping row has already kicked up a political storm with much of the monsoon session being disrupted over the issue. But the issue is beyond just a political slugfest between ruling party and the opposition. The Issue is about the Citizens of India and their rights. That Right to Privacy is a fundamental right and snooping of citizens means breaching that fundamental right. it is important to find out who is responsible for this.
Today, the Supreme court of India has asked the committee to submit its report within 2 months. Additionally, the Supreme Court had some very pertinent observations for the Government of India which has remained rather stubborn over the Pegasus issue calling it a conspiracy by anti-national elements.

Prime Time With Ravish Kumar | Pegasus Snooping Case Highlights: Supreme Court Forms Probe Panel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JczpmsqBJ2k  Oct 27, 2021

डॉ सुनीलम: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AiXYIRE1zsiakT5RF4DbfvFe-bOo?e=Hxdaf7 
किसानों को न्याय दिलाने का ऐतिहासिक आंदोलन: दशा और दिशा  

The strength of the movement led by the Samyukta Kisan Morcha is the farmer activists of 550 farmer organizations who have declared that till the law is not repealed, there will be not return home.
All decisions of the movement are taken after a long process of deliberation. The 32 Jathabandis of Punjab discuss any issue first. The working group members of All India Kisan Sangharsh Coordination Committee also discuss at their level and a decision is taken in the open meeting of Samyukta Kisan Morcha as accepted by all organizations.

Meanwhile, the central government is working on a strategy to tire the agitators and compromise them with neglect, but the base of the movement is expanding. Public opinion is also constantly changing in favor. However, Godi Media has left no stone unturned to defame the entire movement. Despite this, farmers are being successful in taking their messages to the villages through social media.

See Hindi original with google translate in English.. https://1drv.ms/u/s!AiXYIRE1zsiakT5RF4DbfvFe-bOo?e=Hxdaf7