useful break down on how prejudice works..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rx4uLSDh3gc Dec 2022
Some of the comments in this video...: That judge is simply brilliant. She just opened the gate to countersue the people attacking religious freedom.....It's not a public accommodation, it's a paid for advertisement in a publication.
In other words, the publication can dictate the direction of the material they want to publish aside from what would fall under libel laws, but there is nothing that can stop the ones wanting a specific inclusion from creating their own website or seeking accommodation with a company that aligns with them.
Website content creators can be looked at like various magazines or TV outlets out there where they should have the freedom to direct their product in the direction they believe in and should not be compelled to do anything different. Otherwise there would be no support to allowing individual platforms at all, like BET and such. It's a contradiction to our laws regarding freedom to mandate inclusion for some and allow segregation for others based on race, creed, color, and orientation. That's the problem with the woke with their attempts at forcing inclusion where it's not accepted and yet want "safe spaces" to deny others from attending, participating, or even existing. -- will we able to make such an argument on say NDTV, after change of boss, or any private website, Will the test be that a service like Google has monopoly and therefore has a no right to discriminate against certain "beliefs"
Comment: Can we take a similar line in the case of police refusal to give permission for certain protest, based on their "belief" that the public order is at stake, based on the concept of a sealed envelope.. you should read all the comments..
(given the rush for privatisation of basic servces, the question is.. ) When can a "business" be expected to have the same responsibilities as State? If NDTV can go to Adani, then Can the largest financer /creditor be held responsible. What if the largest financer was not State Bank but a Private Bank.. Under what circumstances can we expect popular channels to respect Right to Expression of an opinion that they do now believe in?