Free Speech
Educate cops on free speech: Supreme Court quashes FIR on Article 370 protest, greeting Pakistan.
The bench of Justices A S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan said,
“Every citizen of India has a right to be critical of the action of abrogation of Article 370 and the change of status of Jammu and Kashmir.” It said “describing the day the abrogation happened as a ‘Black Day’ is an expression of protest and anguish. If every criticism or protest of the actions of the State is to be held as an offence under Section 153-A, democracy, which is an essential feature of the Constitution of India, will not survive”.
Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code penalises “promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony”
“The right to dissent in a legitimate and lawful manner is an integral part of the rights guaranteed under Article 19 (1) (a). Every individual must respect the right of others to dissent. ..“But the protest or dissent,” it said, “must be within four corners of the modes permissible in a democratic set-up...Pointing to “the WhatsApp status of the appellant” Hajam, it said, “This is an expression of his individual view and his reaction to the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India” and “does not reflect any intention to do something which is prohibited under Section 153-A. At best, it is a protest, which is a part of his freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a).”..
Setting aside the High Court ruling, the bench said “the High Court has held that the possibility of stirring up the emotions of a group of people cannot be ruled out… “The test to be applied,” it said, is “not the effect of the words on some individuals with weak minds or who see a danger in every hostile point of view. The test is of the general impact of the utterances on reasonable people who are significant in numbers. Merely because a few individuals may develop hatred or ill will, it will not be sufficient to attract clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 153-A of the IPC”.
Twitter has, in their handle https://twitter.com/GlobalAffairs exposed the censorship that is being carried out by the BJP Govt. https://twitter.com/GlobalAffairs/status/1760387644608192560?t=9QEgy68CU2ikSJQ57olOyg&s=19
The Indian government has issued executive orders requiring X to act on specific accounts and posts... a writ appeal challenging the Indian government's blocking orders remains pending...The lack of disclosure (of such orders) can lead to a lack of accountability and arbitrary decision-making.
Posts by Linda Yaccarino @lindayaX
X is an entirely new company working tirelessly to elevate all our priorities with a renewed philosophy on transparency..... In line with our commitment, we continue to work closely with the European Commission on our Digital Services Act (DSA) compliance.
Manu @mshahi0024 ...-Curbing Voices of Accounts,who are representing the protestor sides of stories, but Zero Actions on Accounts,who r spreading Consistent FAKE misinformation against the Protesters... Murder of Article 19.
Paul Koshy @Paul_Koshy·We are past the age of free speech and entering another age- an age of thought control. You will say what thought control prompts you to say. It is a serious problem.
Pooja Sangwan @ThePerilousGirl Freedom of speech comes with duties but if someone not comply with those duties it's the government's responsibility to take action against those to maintain the sovereignty and integrity of India. Riot creators, mis information spreader, anarchy creators doesn't deserve freedom of spreading such venomous views over social media in a country of large diversity with the population of 140 crores the views that can be very harmful for the India as a nation and threat to the constitution of India. Law of the land is necessary you can not interrupt in law for the sake of freedom of speech.
Vertigo_Warrior @VertigoWarrior The law of the land must be respected. Accounts/ posts which spread misinformation, can lead to communal clashes or are a likely threat to the security may need to be restricted. Free speech is never absolute. Even x restricts reach based on the content they seem inappropriate
Darshan Pathak @darshanpathak It is Indian Govt's responsibility to maintain law and order. It is well within its right to do what it is doing to prevent riots and violence. You will have to comply with all the orders. And you can shove your disagreement far up where the sun don't shine.
Bitcoin Bowhunter @CryptoBow82 We all know that any appeals will be delayed until after the election cycle! This is nothing more than a back door to censorship for political gains! Do better X
ट्विटर ने बोला सच, सरकार बंद करा रही है अकाउंट https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb2vyx0Azrs
Ravish Kumar Official
In the wake of the scheduled ‘Delhi Chalo’ farmers’ protest on February 13, the Haryana government on Saturday evening announced the suspension of mobile internet services from February 11 to February 13 in Ambala, Kurukshetra, Kaithal, Jind, Hisar, Fatehabad and Sirsa including Dabwali districts. \https://thewire.in/agriculture/internet-suspended-in-7-haryana-districts-as-farmers-plan-for-delhi-chalo-protest
In an order, additional chief secretary, Haryana government T.V.S.N. Prasad said that in view of the call for a farmers’ march/agitation given by certain organisations,”There is a clear potential of disruption of public utilities, damage to public assets and amenities and disturbance of public law and order in above mentioned districts on account of misuse of internet services by way of spread of inflammatory material and false rumours, which are being/could be transmitted/circulated to the public through social media/messaging services on mobile internet services, SMS services and other dongle services.” All Haryana telecom operators have been directed to ensure compliance with the order.
by Kusum Arora and Vivek Gupta
11/02/2024
The three curators and organisers of the Vidarbha Literary Festival have stepped down, allegedly after right-wing activists began threatening them and approached key family members. The festival, exclusively catering to non-fiction writings and started just months before the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, is scheduled to have its next edition in February 2024. But curators Sukhada Chaudhary and Pawan Sarda and organiser Ruta Dharamadhikari collectively decided to step down last week.
Sources privy to the developments at the festival said that activists belonging to right-wing organisations raised objection over four of the many speakers who were invited to the festival. The objection was against inviting journalists and authors like Aakar Patel, Josy Joseph, Shruti Ganpataye and Shivam Shankar Singh to the festival. For the February 2024 edition, around 40 speakers were invited.
11/10/2023
https://thewire.in/rights/umar-khalid-the-historian-his-continued-imprisonment-is-a-loss-to-the-academic-world
When a Muslim like Umar Khalid crosses boundaries, there is a further panic attack. A young articulate Muslim man who does not wear a skull cap, who is an atheist, who did his Ph.D. from JNU in history on Adivasis in Singbhum is seen as an anomaly in the segregated world the RSS wants to create. The attempt is then to reduce him to just one aspect of his identity – so that whatever else he does or says or writes in the end he must be seen merely as a Muslim, and by extension, violent, anti-national, and a threat to the “Indian mainstream”. So dangerous that he has been in jail for three years without bail. It is not surprising that so many of the young people who were arrested for the anti-CAA protests were Muslim students at India’s leading universities.
Umar’s thesis, titled ‘Contesting Claims and Contingencies of Rule: Singhbhum 1800 – 2000’, is a well-researched and deeply insightful exploration of the relationship between Adivasis and the state, in what is seen as one of the most ‘isolated’, ‘backward’ tracts of India, even as it is the site of extensive mining.
Umar argues that contrary to the received wisdom which has pitted a homogenous Adivasi society against the state, the state intervened through the fractures within Adivasi society.
07/08/2023
- Democracy Needs Dissenters, Critical Thinkers. But IISc Row Reveals Eroding Academic Freedom.
- venkaiah naidu on press freedom
- Why Bombay HC’s Denial of Free S peech on the Basis of Profession Is Problematic
- India’s ‘thought-free’ universities and the danger of the ripples from a single dissenting pebble
- seminar on ‘fascism’
- Final Assault on India’s Press Freedom Has Begun
- India tops in internet shutdowns globally for the fifth consecutive year: Report
- ‘Hypersensitive’: Bombay HC Quashes FIRs Against Congress Leader Who Criticsed BJP Minister
- 'Tis the Season of Literary Events – And Censorship
- Neha Singh Rathore
- A new phase of censorship creep in India
- Rana Ayyub award
- For Speaking an Unpleasant Truth, Will Amitabh Bachchan Now Be Called an Enemy of the People?
- If Journalism falters, Democracy falls: Justice B.N. Srikrishna
- why we only read critical reports about big business in the foreign press or independent media
- The Wire - Meta Face0ff
- English courts get new powers to dismiss Slapp cases against reporters
- Saket Gokhale detained by Gujarat Police in Jaipur for tweet about Morbi bridge collapse
- Climate of Fear, Intellectuals Hesitate to Express Dissent
- Zubair get Bail
- Journalists in India Face Many-Sided Threats
- PM modi comments on Ajit Anum's Reporting
- Why Mamata Banerjee's Alleged "Positive News For Govt Ads" Offer Is A Step Towards Godi Media 2.0
- FIRs Registered Against HW Networks Journalists
- NL Tippani on Surveys and Advertorials
- पत्रकारों पर ठोक दिया मुकदमा
- Blatant Attack on Press Freedom in IT 'Survey'
- Newslaundry: "Was Told Can't Speak To Lawyer"
- Why was Ajit Anjum's Twitter account blocked ?
- Tax "Surveys" At Offices Of News Sites
- Dalit Times Journalist Detained and Coverage Deleted
- Hathway without Prime Time with Ravish!
- NDTV India dropped from TV package!
- Defamation Suit by One Journalist against Another
- Files: Kashmir or Gujarat.. is the same?
- Reporters without Borders Report
- 1990 - Justice P. N. Bhagwati's speech on Freedom of Expression
- New IT Rules - Arfa Khanum
- Wire documentary on Mosque demolition
- Srikrishna to New IT rules
- Media Firms Move Madras HC
- Cartoonist get a twitter notice on Complaint from Government
- FIR Against Twitter And Journalists
- Free Speech - Hate Speech - Election Speech
- Free Speech creating Public Order Crisis?
- Academic Freedom
- 'Deprived of Rights, Non-Application of Mind': J&K HC Tears Into PSA Proceedings Against Fahad Shah
- Bombay High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Kashmiri Professor Booked For WhatsApp Status on J & K 370
- Allahabad HC restrains Al Jazeera from telecasting documentary on Hindutva in India
- Allahabad HC ‘Restrains’ Al Jazeera From Airing Docu on India’s Muslims for Fear of ‘Evil Consequences’
- 7 Imprisoned Journalists in India as of December 1, 2022