Justice Shinde said "If you don't have faith in the system, why approach the court?" https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/bombay-high-court-takes-objection-lawyers-article-criticizing-handling-stan-swamy-bail-case-175185
(Comment: Do we have any other option? When given the circumstances, the power is with the court, whether we have faith or not, is not an issue. It is the option given by law, ...Yet we keep hearing many litigants keep saying "that they have full faith in the judiciary", I wondered why. This only happened with the Lord of yore!)
At the cost of repetition, I don't read news reports because of lack of time. But in this case, there was a discussion. Why come before us if you don't have faith in us? So many matters regarding freedom of speech and expression, which we have heard and allowed. Keep faith in us and in the system. We are here to do justice, unafraid of anyone."
Chaudhry was quick to add, "It is only because we have faith in the court that we come to the court. But sometimes, the court lets down the faith we have in it." Vehemently defending his junior's actions, Chaudhry said that neither he nor his junior had represented Swamy. And he would continue to write and also seek relief from the court. "If I am writing articles while arguing the same matter, then I or anyone from my chamber will rightly stand rebuked," he said, adding that the courts can be criticised for their decisions.
In response, Justice Shinde said he was not against freedom of speech and expression, but Swamy's bail plea was sub-judice. Moreover, the advocate may not have represented Father Swamy, but most of the Bhima Koregaon - Elgar Parishad Case matters are on a similar footing.
Comment2 : If the entire case of all the Bhima Koregaon case is on a "similar footing" cant we expect the court to take a holistic view of the matter, when it seems that court after court keep passing judgements in the narrow immediate plea.