CJI N V Ramana calls for ‘Indianisation’ of country’s legal system https://indianexpress.com/article/india/justice-system-colonial-not-suited-for-indian-population-says-cji-7517470/
“When I say Indianisation, I mean the need to adapt to the practical realities of our society and localise our justice delivery systems. For example, parties from a rural place fighting a family dispute are usually made to feel out of place in the court. They do not understand the arguments or pleadings which are mostly in English, a language alien to them. These days, judgments have become lengthy, which further complicates the position of litigants. For the parties to understand the implications of a judgment, they are forced to spend more money” .
The CJI stated that it is the duty of lawyers and judges to create an environment that is comforting for the litigants and other stakeholders. “We must not forget that the focal point of any justice delivery system is ‘the litigant-the justice seeker’,” he said, adding that “in this light, usage of alternate dispute mechanism such as mediation and conciliation would go a long way in reducing the friction between parties and would save resources. This also reduces the pendency and requirement for having lengthy arguments with lengthy judgments”.
Comment: Beyond pious words, the SC can easily lay down guidelines for recording and storing at the Panchyat level including some minimum information on the data and documents, oral testimony at any alternative dispute mechanism including Khaps. This will help litigants to approah the higher courts if needed, at the same time record their receipt of the verdicts.