'Towards a dystopian future'(!): Implications of the Supreme Court judgement on bifurcation of Kashmir by Shukla Sen: https://groups.google.com/g/greenyouth/c/443B3S-WNuU The Centre would proclaim President's rule in a state governed by an opposition party -- on whatever (concocted) ground. Then the parliament -- in which the party ruling at the Centre is obviously having majority (which is liable to be further enhanced by expelling/suspending opposition members) -- would assume the power of the (dissolved) state legislature. And do to the state as it wishes!!!
P Chidambaram writes: Towards a dystopian future https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/supreme-court-article-370-verdict-abrogation-of-article-370-jammu-and-kashmir-9071154/ there are other aspects of the ‘abrogation’ of Article 370 that are disturbing: the legality of the process followed by the central government/ Parliament and its implications for ‘federalism’ and ‘states’ rights’. These aspects concern not only Jammu & Kashmir, but all states of the country.
In Article 370 Case, Supreme Court Set A Worrying Precedent For Federalism https://www.livelaw.in/articles/in-article-370-case-supreme-court-set-a-worrying-precedent-for-federalism-244288 Manu Sebastian 12 Dec 2023 The Court's view that a State's nature can be altered unilaterally by the Centre during the President's rule does not portend well for federalism.