000-tobecategorised
The Truth about Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT | Dhruv Rathee https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJefOB8kec8 Jul 16, 2023 Over the past year, artificial intelligence has emerged as a prominent and widely discussed subject. It is no longer merely a buzzword, but rather a practical tool that we can actively employ. Revolutionary platforms such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are transforming the functioning of our world. However, the advancement of AI also raises significant and profound inquiries. Will AI supersede human capabilities? Does it pose a threat to humanity's existence? What about the potential job displacement caused by AI? If you share these concerns, watch this video by Dhruv Rathee, where he delves into the realities of artificial intelligence, offering insights and answers to these pressing questions.
The Future of Jobs 2020 report WEF: Recession and Automation Changes Our Future of Work, But There are Jobs Coming, Report Says 20 Oct 2020
The workforce is automating faster than expected, displacing 85 million jobs in next five years
The robot revolution will create 97 million new jobs, but communities most at risk from disruption will need support from businesses and governments
In 2025, analytical thinking, creativity and flexibility are among the top skills needed; with data and artificial intelligence, content creation and cloud computing the top emerging professions
The most competitive businesses will be those that choose to reskill and upskill current employees
The public sector will need a three-tiered approach to help workers. This includes providing stronger safety nets for displaced workers, improving the education and training systems and creating incentives for investments in markets and the jobs of tomorrow.
Companies can measure and disclose their treatment of employees by adopting environmental, social and governance (ESG) metrics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eH1fFdjzJAw What will the future of jobs be like?
Antimarket: Capitalism Decarbonised https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v46/n07/william-davies/antimarket review of Review and discussion of: The Price is Wrong: Why Capitalism Won’t Save the Planet , by Brett Christophers
Liberal ideology imagine that ‘economic life’ (i.e. competitive egalitarian markets) still rules the roost. This myopia is manifest in the economics curricula of major universities, which have continued to exclude theories which emphasise power, uncertainty, monopoly and instability, and clung to an orthodoxy in which economic activity is chiefly determined by prices and incentives.
Politicians, meanwhile, cleave to liberal fairy tales about making work pay, social mobility, and ownership for all—which are increasingly divorced from a reality of in-work poverty, unearned wealth, and spiralling rents. And financial services masquerade as just another ‘sector’ among many, selling their wares in a marketplace like humble shopkeepers.
Brett Christophers, in The Price Is Wrong, adds to this list a potentially more drastic symptom: a failure on the part of policymakers to understand the energy transition on which the future of the planet hinges. The operating assumption of energy economists over the years has been that the key obstacle to the growth of renewable energy is its higher cost, which renders it unable to compete against fossil fuels in the energy market, and hence reliant on government subsidy. It was a moment of great excitement, therefore, when in 2015 the International Energy Agency reported that, finally, renewable technologies (primarily solar and wind farms) were ‘no longer cost outliers’ relative to gas, coal, oil and nuclear power generation.
the goods on which society depends have been privatised in the name of encouraging market competition, but with results that look nothing at all like a ‘free’ market, and with predictable beneficiaries. These goods haven’t just been privatised, but ‘assetised’, in the sense that they have been packaged up, quantified and managed in ways that suit the calculations and interests of financiers. (The difference in the case of renewable energy is how unusually treacherous the assetisation project has been, to the point where it has often proved impossible to get the necessary turbines and solar panels built in the first place.) The financial sector deals in the language of risk, but it seeks out situations in which profitability is effectively guaranteed, a certain level of return baked in.
the central fact of the climate crisis is that there is very little time, and the scale of the political challenge increases with each passing day. The importance of acting as swiftly as possible scrambles our usual political and moral coordinates, forcing us to look beyond the political and economic solutions we might usually hope for, and more favourably on those which are considered ‘realistic’.
Waiting for solutions to emerge in a bottom-up fashion, whether from activists or from markets, is not sufficient. Only the state has the power, the money and the coordinating capacity to direct capital investment at sufficient scale and speed towards the renewables sector. In practice, the distinction between a ‘de-risking’ state (which tops up private sector profits) and a Green New Deal (which builds new public infrastructure) may be less clear-cut than it appears on paper. The priority, as it has been now for decades, is to go as big and as soon as possible
While Kashmir takes the spotlight, Jammu, too, has several new projects coming up, especially in the industrial sector since then. These may be significant changes, but are not necessarily a product of abrogation of Article 370.
The Centre came up with New Industrial Policy (NIP) 2021 for Jammu and Kashmir that came into effect 1 April 2021. Launched by L-G Manoj Sinha, the benefits of this policy have been largely drawn by the Jammu region, primarily the districts of Jammu, Kathua and Samba.
Currently, the groundwork of around Rs 20,000 crore worth of industrial units is already underway that have come up in the last three years and are registered under the policy, according to official figures of the J&K government accessed by ThePrint.
A further break reveals that over Rs 16,000 crore worth of investments (or, 80 percent) are in Jammu division alone, while the rest of investment is in Kashmir, which is less than a fifth of overall investment.
”August 2019 changes had little to do with the rise in industries. It is purely this lucrative industrial policy that has given rise to industries in Jammu. Owing to security concerns and increased freight, people prefer their industries in Jammu than Kashmir,” the official said. “However, we are unable to make the most of the employment generated. There is a substantial lack of skilled labour in Jammu because of which people from outside take jobs.”
23/04/2024
- View from the Margins: In the tea gardens of Bengal, neither Ram Mandir nor Kashmir is a poll issue
- Rethinking Political Economy
- the National Green Tribunal recently took a suo motu cognisance
- Modi has been on a spree of ‘interviews’ with no interruptions, follow-ups, or counter-questions.
- ‘Our rule of law is under attack from our own government
- 5 Nyaya- as manifesto of INDIA Congress
- What's whatapp upto!
- New Attacks on Democratic Rights -
- Aurobindo, Kejriwal and Bonds
- Riverfronts kill rivers, protestors