https://energy.prayaspune.org/our-work/policy-regulatory-engagements/rp75of2025 MSEDCL seeks additional costs : (a) Rs. 55,600 crores in Capex, (b) Rs. 69,800 crores due to errors in MERC power procurement model (c) Rs. 3,272 crores due to errors in agricultural demand estimation methodology (d) Rs. 11,751 crores due to dispensations approved by Supreme Court, APTEL and MERC in various orders. MSEDCL has also claimed erroneous classification of hotel industry and specification of time-of-day tariffs with clarifications on banking restrictions.
https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2015/14553/14553_2015_6_1501_62958_Judgement_06-Aug-2025.pdf
https://cercind.gov.in/2025/orders/38.pdf
https://aptel.gov.in/sites/default/files/2025-04/RP%201%20of%202025%20.pdf
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Monday conducted searches at premises linked to climate advocacy group Satat Sampada Pvt Ltd in a case of alleged foreign exchange violations, with the agency claiming that the company is “suspected” to be receiving funds from abroad to “run narratives to influence government policies in the energy sector”.
The company, which also runs the NGO Satat Sampada Climate Foundation, is co-founded by well-known climate activist Harjeet Singh. A globally recognised face in climate circles, Singh has been a prominent non-government voice for over two decades, playing an active role in international negotiations on behalf of observer organisations. He is known to have done significant background work on creating a framework for the Loss and Damage Fund — for nations most vulnerable and impacted by climate change — which was set up in Dubai in 2023.
#SupremeCourt observed that the "Terrorist Act" may not confined to the use of bombs, explosives, firearms, or other conventional weapons alone. It encompasses acts which disrupt supplies or services essential to the life of the community, as well as acts which threaten the economic security of the nation. https://x.com/CiteCase/status/2008143492082720864
"87. The means by which such acts may be committed are not confined to the
use of bombs, explosives, firearms, or other conventional weapons alone.
Parliament has consciously employed the expression “by any other means of
whatever nature”, which expression cannot be rendered otiose. The statutory
emphasis is thus not solely on the instrumentality employed, but on the design,
intent, and effect of the act. To construe Section 15 as limited only to conventional
modes of violence would be to unduly narrow the provision, contrary to its plain
language.
88. The consequences contemplated under Section 15 further illuminate the
legislative understanding of terrorism. Apart from death or destruction of
property, the provision expressly encompasses acts which disrupt supplies or
services essential to the life of the community, as well as acts which threaten the
economic security of the nation. This reflects Parliament’s recognition that threats
to sovereignty and security may arise through conduct that destabilises civic life.."
What is the meaning of conduct that destabilizes civic life?"
More often it is the state that is guilty of this or so it seems to my limited understanding