Interfaith relations can't be dubbed as a form of love jihad: HC  https://www.rediff.com/news/report/interfaith-relations-cant-be-dubbed-as-love-jihad-hc/20230301.htm

The high court rejected the love jihad argument, .."Merely because the boy and girl are from different religions, it cannot have a religions angle. It can be a case of pure love for each other," the court said. "It appears that now the colour has been tried to be given of love jihad, but when love is accepted then there is less possibility of the person being trapped just for converting him into the other's religion," it added.

As per the prosecution case, the man and woman were in a relationship since March 2018. The man belonged to a Scheduled Caste community, but did not disclose this to the woman.

Around 60 families live in the area near Janata Camp, and their children study in nearby schools. Some of them have received notices to vacate their huts.

Watch: 'Government Is Removing Us From Our Homes Over the G20 Summit' (thewire.in)

People living in front of Pragati Maidan in Delhi have received notices to vacate their huts. A resident, Mohammad Ali Hussain, claims to have lived here since 1993.

by Atul Ashok Howale

26/02/2023

Most of us tend to think that if google and all our other apps are taking all our information in any case, why not go ahead with other apps which collect "family" information. We think we can somehow manage as the data will get lost and depersonalized. This perhaps is the case with corporates at the macro level, but there are algorithms in the big bad world, which deal with more personalized matters.. marriage's, jobs, legal proceedings, political mobilization, market targeting for more than simple commercial purposes. Many of these algorithms work from non-transparent geographies. http://emeets.lnwr.in/index.php/3690-loopholes-in-google-s-data-safety-labels-keep-companies-in-the-clear-and-consumers-in-the-dark  The debate on a gate-keeping app seems to be forgotten. Unfortunately, government regulations on this, leave alone proper oversight is very slow and wanting. In any case corporates, especially those entities : with "limited liability" protection, and obscure holdings many of them in questionable geographies, are difficult to pin down.

Many a times we have found ourselves changing our privacy settings, because a particular app needs some information and since we were busy at that time wanting to get done with something, we click OK. Similarly, when matters related to family and homestead, you just don't know how the compiling of data at the community level can be engaged with. Just a board saying you are under CCTV surveillance, or :your phone number/pix or noentry" is no protection. Society needs to be more particular if it needs to survive.