000-tobecategorised

Congress MP Dhiraj Sahoo के घर cash मिलने का Sanjay Jha ने बताया पूरा सच! Dhiraj Sahoo cash video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9dtmB3zNWM 

237K views 5 days ago #dhirajsahu #publicmeter #rahulgandhi
BJP leaders are trolling Rahul Gandhi because more than Rs 250 crore in cash was recovered from the house of Congress MP Dheeraj Sahu. Praveen Gautam's analysis on how political analyst Sanjay Jha showed the bigger picture of politics when so much black money was found in the house of a Congress MP.

Mahua Moitra speech on Adani: He is the remote control behind the PM  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_UICBipWx4
Feb 8, 2023 Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra made a piercing speech at the Lok Sabha on 7th February, saying that we have all been fooled and ‘topi pehenaaoed’ by a certain industrialist whose name starts with A and ends with I, but is not Advani. Responding to the President’s address naming corruption and institutional favouritism as the biggest banes of the country, Mahua called the union government out saying that the pride of India does not lie in the wealth of one individual, but in the robustness of its institutional structures.

https://thewire.in/law/the-last-pillar-of-indian-democracy-has-fallen 

the Supreme Court has opened the way for his or any future government to amend the Constitution without having to bother with getting a two-thirds majority in both houses of Parliament.

To justify its decision, the bench has put forward two other supporting arguments. The first is that Article 370 was placed in part 21 of the Constitution titled “Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions”. Thus it was never meant to be permanent. So all that the Modi government has done is to close the chapter on Kashmir.

The second is that over the decades since the accession, Kashmir’s laws have in any case been brought in line progressively with those of the rest of India. So as the government has argued, the autonomy shielded by Article 370 had been been ‘gradually eroded’.

What the Supreme Court has chosen to ignore is that all this was done with the consent of the Kashmir governments of the time. Sheikh Abdullah had signed the Delhi agreement only after convening a constituent Assembly with 75 members, to approve of it. In the decades that followed, more and more all-India laws and provisions were extended to Kashmir as well with the full consent, often at the request of, the Kashmir government. As Sheikh Abdullah’s talks with Indira Gandhi’s special representative, G. Parthasarathy, before returning to power showed, there was next to nothing left that he wanted to change.

This process was a world away from the sleight of hand that the Modi government used in 2019, to ‘complete’ the integration. The contrast between ‘erosion by consent’ and ‘erosion through brute force’ was vividly demonstrated by the weeks-long curfews, the complete shut down of internet services, and the paralysis of transport even afterwards that forced people catching flights out of Kashmir to walk kilometres to get to the airport. For the Supreme Court to have glossed over this stark and humiliating difference is inexcusable.