000-tobecategorised
US–China Trade War: Jayati Ghosh’s Must-Watch Breakdown https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoUwLp960jc India & Global Left
Jayati Ghosh on Tariff Wars, Dollar Hegemony & Global Trade | US-China, Global South, Agriculture & Growth Models. Tariff Wars & Protectionism – Who gains and who loses in the new trade order? US-China Trade Conflict – A deep dive into the economic, political, and strategic dimensions. Agriculture & Tariffs – How farmers, food security, and rural economies are being reshaped. Dollar Hegemony & the US Deficit – Can the US sustain its global financial dominance? Export-Led Growth in the Global South – Is it still a viable model, or do we need a new development path? Crisis of Globalization – What comes after neoliberal free trade?
Substack: https://substack.com/@indiagloballeft
This was a way of containing China. They called it a trade war. It was mostly a technology war It was mostly trying to prevent China from getting ahead in technology So much so that this was actually continued by Joe Biden So yes China is dependent on the US for exports but much much less so than it used to be. One major feature of US public finance over the last 20 years has been progressive tax reductions for the wealthy beginning with Clinton by the way . Actually beginning with Reagan. continuing over over these this entire period. that has meant a dramatically reduced capacity to finance basic expenditures. You know a crisis in the US is a signal for capital to come flooding back to the crisis because it's a flight to safety So it has been for now decades the lynch pin of the global monetary system and the US has had huge benefits from it contrary to what Trump and his adviser Peter Navaro seem to think. US may not necessarily be at the top rung all the time in a very steady fashion anymore but we the the other developing world will be remain in the lower rung and so whenever there's uncertainty we will face capital flight . We don't think that's possible and I I'm not sure he would say that that is really the aim uh you know a sort of
1:33
semi-autic shall we
[03:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoUwLp960jc&t=189s) What is driving Trade war?
[12:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoUwLp960jc&t=759s) Ken Griffin and restoring
[13:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoUwLp960jc&t=837s) China or US- Who will win?
[19:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoUwLp960jc&t=1198s) US Debt and deficit
[30:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoUwLp960jc&t=1800s) Bond sell off recently
[32:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoUwLp960jc&t=1964s) Impact of trade war on Global South
[39:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoUwLp960jc&t=2340s) Agricultural and tariffs
[46:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoUwLp960jc&t=2788s) Vision of a fair globalisation
Waroholic: Why The USA Is ADDICTED To Mass-Violence https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F8KhIHXz0M | Prof. Radhika Desa iWar is not a choice. War is a system—a self-perpetuating process. And in the US we have a deadly principe of mass-slaughter and violence baked into the logic of the economic organisation of the nation. Listen to Professor Radhika Desai dismantling the core of the imperial logic with her Geopolitical Economy approach to Marxist theory.
https://valdaiclub.com/a/valdai-papers/valdai_paper_24_geopolitical_economy_the_discipline_of_multipolarity/ https://valdaiclub.com/files/10943/
https://www.academia.edu/77369299/Marx_s_geopolitical_economy_The_relations_of_producing_nations_2021_ contrary to the widespread tendency to take Marx as a theorist of ‘globalization’, Marx actually took the existence of nation-states and national economies seriously and conceived of their interrelations as arising from the contradictions of capitalism.
Top 9 Nuclear-Armed Nations In 2025 https://zeenews.india.com/photos/world/top-9-nuclear-armed-nations-in-2025-india-ranks-at-pakistan-at-check-full-list-2899025/united-states-5277-nuclear-warheads-2899032
Russia – 5,449 Nuclear Warheads -core pillar of its defense strategy and global power status
United States – 5,277 Nuclear Warheads - land-based missiles, submarine-launched warheads, and aerial bombs: Disarmament diplomacy, Modernising
China – 600 Nuclear Warheads desire for strategic balance with the U.S. and India,
France – 290 Nuclear Warheads mainly submarine-launched ballistic missiles Separate nuclear forces. views them as essential for national and European defense
United Kingdom – 225 Nuclear Warheads mostly in Trident submarines : Reviews have called for modernizing, reflecting security Concerns in Europe
India – 180 Nuclear Warheads- "No First Use" policy, India’s strategy emphasizes minimum credible deterrence.
Pakistan – 170 Nuclear Warheads - deterring conventional conflict with India
Israel (90) policy of nuclear ambiguity
North Korea (50) despite sanctions, continued testing
- Competitive Authoritarianism To Electoral Autocracy
- The Decline & Fall of the U.S. Dollar
- India and Pakistan lock horns: Who won and why?
- पाकिस्तान का प्रॉपगैंडा, भारत का जवाब
- What possible war strategies can both countries employ?-
- Indian Nationalism, Hindutva and the Bomb
- This Is What a Digital Coup Looks Like | Carole Cadwalladr | TED
- Pahalgam and after: How women are used as instruments of politics and conflict
- Why Criticizing Israel Isn’t Anti-Semitic - Jeffrey Sachs Interview
- Violence Will Increase in J&K After Operation Sindoor