Human Rights Defenders Data Information Knowledge Solidarity
HRDs must counter State's offensive of intimidating ordinary people, from expressing their opinion on social media or on various issues . Lawyers as well as Journalists, and youtubers bring these cases up in the public eye in order to youth to feel more secure speaking out.. This series we will document case law as well as reports through links to documents, reports from various websites and Blogs and Posts of HRDs. This is also an attempt to publicise all the dirty tricks State have been using. This is a contributory effort..
how do you give back years that you have confined somebody who is innocent. https://youtube.com/embed/y3Z5ME2ERhM?start=1007&end=1090 Is monetary compensation sufficient. Shouldnt the system pay by making changes, or develop legislation that will check whether public servants have done wrong. Did they do it in good faith, or something that was patently illegal? A mandatory judicial inquiry followed by a white paper for every incarceration of a year and above, if the person is proved to be innocent. Affidavit should be asked from each official right from the officer taking down the FIR, to the investigator, the procecutor, and published in the white paper, so that there is public scrutiny of all the events.
Post by TS: There were over 75 UAPA cases in the ten UPA years 85 % Muslims incarcerated and Mumbai ATS involved in many: the draconian law began to be used way back then
Prime Time With Ravish Kumar: 3 Student-Activists Arrested In Delhi Riots Case Released On Bail https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3Z5ME2ERhM Three student-activists, arrested for alleged role in Delhi riots case, walked out of Delhi's Tihar jail, hours after a court ordered their immediate release. Ms Narwal, Ms Kalita and Mr Tanha had moved the trial court for their immediate release after they remained imprisoned past the 1 pm deadline set by the High Court yesterday. They were ordered to be released on personal bonds of ₹ 50,000 each and two sureties of a similar amount.
Natasha says no regrets for what they did, but regret that the movement was cut short
https://twitter.com/HemantSorenJMM/status/1405034800730152966
HM in a post: The government knows that the case is fake, and conviction is very unlikely. The punishment is only by process, mainly almost indefinite incarnation without any opportunity to prove their innocence
S, PUCL in a post
Once bail is granted, delaying release makes the custody illegal and the remanding judge is accountable for the illegality.
You have Chandrachud's ruling in Arnab Goswami case pontificating how right to life and liberty is sacrosanct and every hour of illegal custody is a violation of a person's rights.
SC Says Delhi HC's UAPA Bail Order Won't Have Precedent Value, but Protects Activists' Freedom https://thewire.in/law/supreme-court-uapa-bail-delhi-hc-narwal-kalita-tanha By holding that the high court judgments granting bail to the activists will have no value as precedents, the vacation bench of the Supreme Court appears to have gone against the ruling of another bench of the court recently.
On April 14, the Supreme Court bench of Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah, deprecated the practice of passing orders suffixed with the caveat that the said order is not to be treated as a precedent on the ground of parity, especially in criminal matters. “It indicates a lack of confidence in one’s own order. My decision is my decision. Saying that it is not to be considered as a precedent shows a lack of moral conviction in one’s own viewpoint. If I feel that an order is vulnerable, I should not pass it at all,” remarked Justice Chandrachud. He added, “Also, it is for the other judge (who is likely to hear a similar matter) to decide if it can be treated as a precedent or not.”
With UAPA After Bengaluru Riot, Innocence Or Guilt Of 163 Men Is Immaterial MOHIT RAO 12 Oct 2020
A wife finds CCTV footage that could prove her husband innocent. He is among 163 Muslims charged—the largest number ever in Karnataka—with terrorism for a night of rioting in Bengaluru. But lawyers say it could be months, even years, before evidence is considered because the anti-terror law allows detention without bail or trial.
Why Delhi HC Bail Order for Natasha, Devangana & Asif Tanha in UAPA Case is Such a Big Deal | Arfa https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UILjbwNbqSI जेएनयू छात्राओं नताशा नरवाल और देवांगना कलीता और जामिया मिलिया इस्लामिया के छात्र आसिफ इकबाल तन्हा पर उत्तर पूर्वी दिल्ली में फरवरी 2020 में हुए सांप्रदायिक हिंसा के लिए साजिश रचने का आरोप है. तीनों को मई 2020 में यूएपीए के तहत गिरफ़्तार किया गया था.
Delhi police seems bent to suppress dissent at the JNU. Court has made clear difference between security of State, Public Order, and Law and Order. and these cases dont come under security of stae level of problem.. It seems a normal issue of law and order.. and therefore does not attract 43D of UAPA..
- Right to Protest Not terrorist Act under UAPA
- The Delhi High Court’s Bail Orders under the UAPA
- Delhi Riots: UAPA case
- Devangana Kalita and Natasha Narwal
- a case of sedition on Thursday against Aisha Sultana
- Sedition Law Must Go
- Umar Khalid
- How governments have been keeping people in Jail under UAPA
- what are frontal organisations? who decides? and Judges?
- Amnesty ?
Subcategories
BAIL
For UAPA articles under
