CED - Documentation & E Library
Data Information Knowledge and Solidarity of HRD

Human Rights Defenders Data Information Knowledge Solidarity

HRDs  must counter State's offensive of intimidating ordinary people, from expressing their opinion on social media or on various issues .  Lawyers as well as Journalists, and youtubers bring these cases up in the public eye in order to youth to feel more secure speaking out.. This series we will document  case law  as well as reports through links to documents, reports from various websites and Blogs and Posts of HRDs. This is also an attempt to publicise all the dirty tricks State  have been using. This is a contributory effort..

Pre trial Jail

उमर ख़ालिद: 1000 दिन बिना बेल, बिना ट्रायल | 1000 days of Umar Khalid's incarceration https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvCCrP1Mrms  Ravish at the press club.. besides there are other like Umar Khalis, Shoma Sen,


Lest We Forget: Umar Khalid Spends 1000 Days In Jail https://www.outlookindia.com/national/lest-we-forget-umar-khalid-spends-1000-days-in-jail-news-293212 As the former JNU scholar completes his 1,000 days in prison, the question of delayed justice comes back to the fore again.

उमर ख़ालिद को जेल में करीब तीन साल होने जा रहे हैं। एक हज़ार दिन हो गए लेकिन इस केस की ट्रायल भी शुरू नहीं हुई है और न उमर को ज़मानत मिली है। दिल्ली के प्रेस क्लब में उमर ख़ालिद के समर्थन में एक सभा हुई, जिसमें कई वक्ताओं ने हिस्सा लिया। राजद सांसद मनोज झा ने भी बोला। गुरमेहर कौर भी थी। प्रभात पटनायक और उमर के पिता S Q R इलियासी ने भी बोला। ट्वीटर पर भी कई लोगों ने उमर खालिद को लेकर यह सवाल उठाया कि एक हज़ार दिन से जेल में हैं, उन्हें ज़मानत नहीं मिली है। यह न्यायपालिका के लिए अच्छी बात नहीं है। प्

UN body statement on Khurram Parvez’s arrest

‘Baseless, unfounded’: India on UN body statement on Khurram Parvez’s arrest https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-united-nations-rights-body-khurram-parvez-arrest-7652198/  
🔴 The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights had also expressed concern over “crackdown on civil society actors”, use of “sweeping counter-terrorism measures”, and killings of civilians.

 

the Indian government on Thursday called the statement “baseless and unfounded” and said that the “arrest and subsequent detention” was done “entirely as per provisions of law”. “It also betrays a complete lack of understanding on the part of the OHCHR of the security challenges faced by India from cross-border terrorism and its impact on the most fundamental human right ‘the Right to Life’ of our citizens including in Jammu and Kashmir.”    

Bagchi, while replying to queries regarding the statement, said, “Referring to proscribed terrorist organisations as ‘armed groups’ demonstrates a clear bias on the part of OHCHR. As a democratic country, with an abiding commitment to promote and protect the human rights of its citizens, India takes all necessary steps to counter cross border terrorism.”

OHCHR, on Wednesday, had expressed concern over the detention and urged the government to “fully safeguard” his rights. The OHCHR had also expressed concern over “crackdown on civil society actors”, use of “sweeping counter-terrorism measures”, and killings of civilians.

“We are deeply concerned at the arrest of Kashmiri human rights defender Khurram Parvez under Indian counter-terrorism legislation, the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA),” OHCHR spokesperson Rupert Colville had said in a statement. 

OHCHR, on Wednesday, had expressed concern over the detention and urged the government to “fully safeguard” his rights. The OHCHR had also expressed concern over “crackdown on civil society actors”, use of “sweeping counter-terrorism measures”, and killings of civilians.

“We are deeply concerned at the arrest of Kashmiri human rights defender Khurram Parvez under Indian counter-terrorism legislation, the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA),” OHCHR spokesperson Rupert Colville had said in a statement.

 

UAPA_cases Persons Arrested & Aquitted - 2019-2020

2021 - 12 - Rajya Sabha - UAPA_cases Persons Arrested & Aquitted - 2019-2020 - 01Dec2021. https://1drv.ms/b/s!AiXYIRE1zsiakgmBfmsS3UHFaMJW?e=PUVZl1 
 
The latest figures of UAPA Arrests and Acquitted were presented in Rajya Sabha yesterday.
In 2019, 1948 Persons were arrested under UAPA and 92 persons were Aquitted.
In 2020, 1321 persons were arrested and 116 persons were acquitted.

Comment:  Caution: Don't get depressed seeing that only so few people are acquitted as trials take years to conclude and so these figures are not the barometer of Rate of Conviction. Conviction Rate is calculated in 2 ways: Conviction rate by number of cases; and Conviction rate by Number off persons arrested.

My team has calculated the Conviction Rate by Number of cases between 2015 - 2020 to be 27.57%. In sharp contrast, the Conviction Rate by number of persons is 2.80%. The latter figure is what is normally used and is a more reliable index.

I think that because the media has been showing poor conviction rate, the Ministry of Home Affairs in their reply to Rajya Sabha on 01st December, 2021 contrasts Number of persons arrested with Number of persons acquitted as though to make the impression that larger numbers of people are convicted, which is not a fact. SO calling attention to this play of statistics.
  1. Is UAPA Being Abused By The State To Suppress Individual Freedom?
  2. UAPA, NSA, PASA, NDPS, ये कानून हैं या फंसाने की बेड़ियां?
  3. UAPA Against Lawyers 'Govt. Hiding Own Incompetence by Silencing Us'
  4. UAPA on SC lawyers, who went Agartala to find facts: PUCL statement
  5. Kappan's custody 'illegal'
  6. Mere association or support for a terror outfit does not attract UAPA
  7. SC Must Repeal Sedition Law, UAPA : Justice Nariman
  8. Why is Gulfisha Fatima Behind Bars for the last 18 months in a 'Free' Country?
  9. Activists’ press conference condemns Umar Khalid’s arrest
  10. Umar Khalid case..

Subcategories

BAIL

For UAPA articles under

Rights in Custody

UAPA

BK16

Stan Swamy Amar Rahe

UAPA - Umar Khalid

UAPA - Newsclick

H R violations documentation

bulldozer

Public Security Bill Maharashtra

Manipur Violence

Free Speech

  Ban on films, documentaries by Government e.g documentary on PM by BBC. Debate on censorship, opinion, statements by media people, leaders, screening of film on Modi at universities etc. 

Corporate Behaviour and Free Speech

In a defamation case against Paranjoy Thakurta,  a  court has order, issued on September 6, directed the removal of defamatory content from their respective articles and social media posts within five days. In the suit filed by Adani Enterprises Ltd, seen by HT, the allegedly defamatory material includes transcripts of YouTube videos, screenshots of X posts by journalists, and images of their X profiles.https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/mib-issues-takedown-notices-to-13-digital-news-publishers-over-adani-defamation-case/ar-AA1MIjBR 

Based on this,  The ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB) on Tuesday issued takedown notices to 13 digital news publishers on YouTube and Instagram for disseminating defamatory content related to Adani Enterprises Ltd.The ministry’s order names journalists, media houses, and creators — including Newslaundry, Ravish Kumar, Dhruv Rathee, The Wire, HW News Network, and Aakash Banerjee’s The Deshbhakt — who have received a list of 138 YouTube video URLs and 83 Instagram links to be taken down.

Page 20 of 148

  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • Home
  • Author Login
  • Learning to Join in this website
  • About This Site
  • Contributor's Login