CED - Documentation & E Library
Data Information Knowledge and Solidarity of HRD

Human Rights Defenders Data Information Knowledge Solidarity

HRDs  must counter State's offensive of intimidating ordinary people, from expressing their opinion on social media or on various issues .  Lawyers as well as Journalists, and youtubers bring these cases up in the public eye in order to youth to feel more secure speaking out.. This series we will document  case law  as well as reports through links to documents, reports from various websites and Blogs and Posts of HRDs. This is also an attempt to publicise all the dirty tricks State  have been using. This is a contributory effort..

Public Security Bill vague, bye-passes courts, gives overriding powers to State: PUCL

Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill repressive, allows misuse: Civil society https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/maharashtra/maharashtra-special-public-security-bill-repressive-allows-misuse-civil-society/article68400402.ece July 14, 2024
Activists and lawyers have flagged seven sections of the proposed legislation, aimed at fighting Naxalism in the State, saying the Bill has far reaching consequences
At least seven sections of the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024 are either vague or bypass courts or give overriding powers to the State machinery, which is far beyond the objective of curbing Naxalism that the ordinance is aimed at, said civil society members.

Read more …

Maharashtra Public Security Bill aims to legitimise the criminalisation of dissenting citizens, human rights defenders and political opponents : PUCL

Maharashtra Public Security Bill aims to legitimise the criminalisation of dissenting citizens, human rights defenders and political opponents : PUCL https://www.groundxero.in/2024/07/14/21310/  14.7.24

Citing ‘Naxalism in urban areas’, Maharashtra Govt tables Bill

Citing ‘Naxalism in urban areas’, Maharashtra Govt tables Bill https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/naxalism-in-urban-areas-maharashtra-govt-tables-bill-9447984/ 
The Bill grants the state the authority to declare an organisation as “unlawful” — a decision which can be reviewed by an advisory board set up by the state government.

the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, which proposes jail term even if a person is “not… a member of an unlawful organisation”, but “contributes/ receives/ solicits any contribution or aid” or “harbours” its member, as well as for those who “promote or assist in promoting a meeting” of such groups. 

The Bill defines an “unlawful activity” as one which constitutes a danger or menace to public order, peace and tranquility; interferes with maintenance of public order, “administration of law or its established institutions and personnel”; designed to show criminal force to any public servant; indulging in or propagating acts of violence, vandalism, use of firearms, explosives or disrupting communications by rail, road, air or water; “encouraging or preaching disobedience to established law and its institutions”; collecting money or goods to carry out unlawful activities.

  1. PUCL TRIBUNAL On Manipur violence
  2. RSS to flag off Chalo Manipur
  3. Manipur: How Misrepresentation of Hmar and Zomi People Made Them Invisible in the Conflict
  4. Manipur isnt about ethnic violence it is a fight for natural resources.
  5. Killings, Rumours, Internet Shutdown: Manipur Returns to Unrest
  6. Ten Things That Emerged Out of a Year of Violence in Manipur
  7. Prime Minister Modi’s anathema for Manipur
  8. In Past Year, Modi Made 162 Trips to Various States, 14 Visits Abroad...and Zero to Manipur
  9. ‘Modiji, Silence Is Not Always Golden’: Protesters Say if Kukis Lose, Indian Democracy Will Lose Too
  10. Internet Ban a Mistake, During Conflict Manipur Media Was 'Meitei Media': EGI Report

Subcategories

BAIL

For UAPA articles under

Rights in Custody

UAPA

BK16

Stan Swamy Amar Rahe

UAPA - Umar Khalid

UAPA - Newsclick

H R violations documentation

bulldozer

Public Security Bill Maharashtra

Manipur Violence

Free Speech

  Ban on films, documentaries by Government e.g documentary on PM by BBC. Debate on censorship, opinion, statements by media people, leaders, screening of film on Modi at universities etc. 

Corporate Behaviour and Free Speech

In a defamation case against Paranjoy Thakurta,  a  court has order, issued on September 6, directed the removal of defamatory content from their respective articles and social media posts within five days. In the suit filed by Adani Enterprises Ltd, seen by HT, the allegedly defamatory material includes transcripts of YouTube videos, screenshots of X posts by journalists, and images of their X profiles.https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/mib-issues-takedown-notices-to-13-digital-news-publishers-over-adani-defamation-case/ar-AA1MIjBR 

Based on this,  The ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB) on Tuesday issued takedown notices to 13 digital news publishers on YouTube and Instagram for disseminating defamatory content related to Adani Enterprises Ltd.The ministry’s order names journalists, media houses, and creators — including Newslaundry, Ravish Kumar, Dhruv Rathee, The Wire, HW News Network, and Aakash Banerjee’s The Deshbhakt — who have received a list of 138 YouTube video URLs and 83 Instagram links to be taken down.

Page 61 of 148

  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • Home
  • Author Login
  • Learning to Join in this website
  • About This Site
  • Contributor's Login